Praise God for GMOs.

Home / Articles / Praise God for GMOs.
Praise God for GMOs.

There is perhaps no more controversial topic within Christianity than that of food. They debated it in the early Church, and we continue to debate it now. Whether the topic is: “Should Christians should drink wine or beer”, or: “What defines gluttony?”, Christians love to debate the theology of food.

Recently a lot of Christians have been debating whether or not Christians should eat Genetically Modified Organisms. Or GMOs. I’ve been part of those discussions. Those debates get almost as nasty as the thought of eating cloned meat. I assume this post will get just as negative a reaction from the same crowds. No worries, the Gospel Spam ComBox is always open, especially for food fights.

I want to be radical for a moment and propose something truly crazy: that is; perhaps, GMOs are a blessing from God. So feel free to clean up your keyboard from spitting out that organic tea and hear me out.

I’m not ignorant to the idea that GMO’s may be bad for you. They might cause cancer. They might make people unhealthy. These are valid concerns.

But then again, these could all be ridiculous conspiracy theories from some hipster organic Illuminati farmers living on a farm compound somewhere deep within urban Portland.

But for the record, I have no problem accepting the position that GMO’s, and more importantly, industrialized farming-both in their current state-are probably somewhat bad for you.

But industrialized farming is a relatively new thing in the history of the world. So are GMOs. Technology always has kinks and quirks in its early stages. No technology is perfect from the start…not even Apple products.

We live in a country that is truly blessed. The reason I know that is because we are having a discussion on the very subject of whether or not we are producing too much food, and if the food we are making should be made at all. The issue as to whether or not we should be eating GMOs is a first world problem- a problem only us fortunate first worlders have. It’s a problem that we should be thankful to God for-if it is a problem.

There are many things to consider here. The first is theological. A lot of people argue that the way the food is made now is not the food we were intended to eat in the Garden of Eden. I would agree to some extent. I would also add that thorns and weeds, and back-breaking sweat required to grow vegetables wasn’t the way we were intended to grow them, either. But you know…sin happens.

But actually, knowing the providence of God, and his original intention for the Gospel to go forth throughout all the world, that overcoming sin, disease and death, and eliminating hunger is actually part of God’s original intention. Technology is used by God to advance the temporal benefits of the Gospel. I believe as the Gospel goes forth, so will science and technology. Eventually men will turn their weapons into plow shares as the spread of the Gospel ushers in Christ’s final consummated Kingdom.

But whether we are talking about before the fall, after the fall, post Great Commission, or even post consummated Kingdom, our responsibilities remain the same: work the earth, grow food, and take care of our families.

And God blessed them. And God said to them, Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food. And it was so. And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day. – Genesis 1:28-31 ESV

So here we see that God gave man every plant to eat, with the sort of assumption that there would be no animal death. Not only are we given every plant to eat, we are given the authority and responsibility to grow it and take care of it.

This is where the question comes in.

Can we modify the seeds? Can we make them grow better, and more reliably?

Are we allowed to make them more thorn resistant?

I would argue of course we can and that it is part of the mandate. Although we do still experience many of the curses of the fall, some of them are being wiped away slowly and surely by the advancement of the Gospel, and eventually all of them will be gone.

As a side note, for anyone who doubts my postmillenial convictions on how the Gospel advances technology: Let’s recall The Tower of Babel, these guys were using technology to build a skyscraper to the heavens. God stopped it.

Now the whole earth had one language and the same words…Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech. Genesis 11:1, 6-7

But then we have these moments in the New Testament, where Jesus repeatedly tells his followers that Nothing is impossible with God, until eventually the curse of Babel is restored at Pentecost. Now we have a space station above the earth-literally in the heavens-built by at least three separate nations, in which the internationals all work together. That could not have happened prior to the ascension of Christ.

But I am getting carried away here. Let’s talk about the commercialization of food.

Recently the McDonalds Cheeseburger won the title of the “cheapest and most nutritious food in human history.” Nowhere in the world can you get more calories, cheaper than a McDonalds Cheeseburger. The obvious response to that is repulsion. How on earth could that be a good thing? Well I would like to argue that it is a good thing. In fact it is not only a good thing, it is a blessing.

From the article:

Kyle Smith, a New York Post columnist, threw his support behind the McDouble’s nutritional value for money.

For the average poor person, it isn’t a great option to take a trip to the Farmer’s Market to puzzle over esoteric lefty-foodie codes (Source)

I believe it was Douglas Wilson who said something along the lines of this: Imagine for a moment that a man washed up on a desert island. There was nothing to eat, but every day Oreos washed up on shore in a box. This happened every day for three years until the man was finally rescued. When he was finally hauled unto the rescue ship the Captain and crew were shocked that the man was overweight. How is that possible? The answer: Oreos.

The response in that situation would not be What a disaster, this man had nothing to eat but trans-fatty Oreos to eat and is now overweight. Woe to this real life Hurley! That would be ridiculous. The actual response would be praise to God for the Oreos. It would be seen as a miracle. Oreos from Heaven!

When someone is in a situation that they have no way of paying for high-priced organic foods, and all they can afford is 2000 McDonald’s calories and processed GMO foods our response shouldn’t be repulsion towards that company. Instead, like the starving man on the Island we should thank God. They can eat within their means and not starve.

I know it sounds crazy, especially to those who grew up on farms, or those who farm, or people who always had fresh home-cooked meals available to them. But this is not the case for everyone and we shouldn’t let angry farmers who have failed at capitalism create unBiblical laws as a means to pay for their family farm.

Is McDonald’s the best option for feeding the poor? Not by a long shot. But McDonalds is indeed feeding the poor and that is something we should be thankful for…even if it’s not a perfect, well-balanced meal.

But let’s put Michelle Obama’s School Health Food program into the equation.

Recently, several school districts took the advice of the Obama administration to serve nothing but “health food”, under the penalty of losing Government funding of course. So long, greasy chocolate-chip cookies and over-saturated cheesy nachos. You kids are going to eat like kings, uh….I mean,… cows.

It sounds like a great idea until you take into effect that the food served within the school cafeteria was the only food many of those kids ever eat. They don’t get to come home to a well-cooked organic meal, prepared by a loving mother. Many of the kids never get a dinner at all. So what has been the result?

The kids were starving. They would go home with no dinner and the health food didn’t sustain them long enough. Eventually the school retreated from the program and returned to its greasy, high caloric roots. It wasn’t perfect, it’s not the ideal, but at least the kids were not starving when they came home from school.

Praise God for Sodexo.

Yes, many kids are obese, and many kids are putting on weight but they aren’t starving to death. Their high calorie meals sustain them through the day. Like Oreos washed up on a desert island.

How to tell with Google Maps where the Rich people live.
How to tell with Google Maps where the Rich people live.

The same is true for McDonald’s, which has a very high urban market. You don’t find McDonald’s next to Whole Foods for a reason. If you only have two dollars to eat, McDonald’s sounds a whole lot better than a head of lettuce.

Praise God for two all beef patties!

I want to reinforce my point that this is not to say that there are not consequences to eating that way. Does eating unhealthily cause cancer, diabetes and a host of other health problems? Of course it does. But so does starvation. At least the former is far slower, and an enjoyable way to die.

Capitalism has found a way to feed the masses of our nation with very little cost to the consumer. That is a good thing. We can sit down over our organic Chai lattes and debate the benefits of each. These debates are literally healthy as they challenge the consumer to think more about what they eat and encourage the corporations to think more about what they sell.

I recall watching a special on CNBC about supermarkets, and the head of Wal-Mart Produce was pointing to the organic section. This section was new in Wal-Mart not because Wal-Mart felt obligated to provide a service to their consumers that they didn’t want. Nor were they forced to do so by the government, but because the market itself demanded it.

As consumers demand higher calorie, low cost, healthier foods, capitalism- an institution by God-will find a way. Cue Jurassic Park theme.

Let’s be honest. In the history of the earth, GMOs are a relatively new problem. And they are indeed a problem that only countries with too much food argue about. It is a problem that solves famines and starvation, and much like antibiotics, overuse can be dangerous. But no one should be arguing against them in their entirety.

Unless of course black plagues are something you aspire to relive.

I for one enjoy going into McDonald’s and never having to worry about being denied a super-sized french fry because of a potato famine. I like knowing that food is abundantly available for low costs and I hope one day that organic foods can be produced, penny to the calorie, match for match against a cheeseburger. But the technology is just not there…yet. So perhaps instead of whining about how evil companies like Monsanto (and yes, they are truly evil crony capitalists) are getting too big and harming your tiny family farm, how about farmers just get smarter than Monsanto, and healthier than Monsanto, and cheaper than Monsanto and more profitable than Monsanto?

Do we have to be responsible? Certainly.

No one is arguing that. GMOs are new, and there are sure to be problems with them. Evil companies working alongside of Big Government certainly doesn’t help.

But three hundred years from now, five hundred years from now, most of those problems will be solved. This includes the problem of producing meat, without animal death.

Soy Bacon is not that appetizing…now…

But as the Gospel advances, capitalism will find a way…

Or else, despite your prayers, there won’t be Chick-Fil-A on the new earth.


I would agree with you mostly on this. However, I would be careful not to patronize those Christians who have chosen to eat healthier foods. If someone has chosen to forego all industrialized farming for environmental or animal welfare reasons, that's not Christian, but those, like myself, have chosen to eat them because they are better for *me.* I do agree, however, that the Gospel has allowed science and technology to advance in ways that otherwise wouldn't be possible, albeit in imperfect ways, including allowing for options in food for those who would otherwise not be able to afford it.


Saying that GMOs are bad for you is silly. Obviously some foods are healthier than others, but even junk food is life sustaining for those without enough to eat. Any starving person would love to have some of the food that is produced in abundance because of new farming techniques, etc.

To those who say we should eat like in the Garden of Eden, I would point out that it is not possible.
Since the fall, all of creation is damaged and their are no foods that contain the same nutrition levels that they did back then. Also remember that Adam and Eve were able to eat from the Tree of Life, which would have restored their bodies forever.


I've found it nearly impossible to find any honest information about GMOs.  Raw data.  And that's not the fault of GMO marketing.  It's the fault of these wild unfounded conspiracy theories.  Just google it and consider the sources of all the hits you're finding and you'll pretty much have your answer.  It's a bunch of reactionary hysteria.  


@cpjackson791 Then why would you eat something that's hard to find info about it?, but go ahead if you thinks it's right, just don't be praising the Lord for it, I made my statement in past commentaries. God bless you.


I would say government skrools are far more dangerous than Monsanto or Dupont.  Let's deal with them first.


"GOD BLESS JUDAS ISCARIOT FOR BETRAYING THE LORD JESUSCHRIST", What would you think if I post an outloud header like that. Just think about it ,if Judas had never betrayed Jesus, redemption would never have done, and we were still dead in our trespasses and sins.

God is sovereign He does what He pleases. But trying to twist scriptural truths in order to make an apology out of it (just as any other fallacy) it's never gonna be OK, even though it seems scriptural.

It's truth that GMO's are threatening human health just as it's truth that Judas Iscariot is in hell and we should not ask God for blessing him. And no matter what you or I say, good is good and evil is evil. Judas Iscariot is not God blessed but cursed and "it would have been good for that man if he had not been born". Who are we to stand up for Judas and ask for a blessing, the same way, who are we to stand up for GMO's and defending them.

The Son of Man indeed goes just as IT IS WRITTEN of Him, but WOE to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born.” (Matthew 26:24)

Judas sinned and he's responsible for what he did, even if God WRITTEN what happened. GMO's are bad even if God decided to feed some people with them.

This pragmatic way of seeing facts are less than really Scriptural. People that crucified the Lord sinned against the Lord, of course, the lord had mercy on them but still sinned. GMO's are bad, even though sometimes I myself eat them because of lack of options.

GMO's can feed people (thank God if someone's hungry can be satisfied with it despite later time consequences) but that doesn't make GMO less dangerous, and WE SHOULD NOT BE PROMOTING THEM.

Yeah! thanks God because there's something with what a hunger person can be feed, but poison it's still poison, just as cancer it's still cancer, and sin will still be sin (I'm not saying GMO's are sins of course).

The bad idea about saying "God bless GMO's" is that this article promotes the propagation of this "cursed fruits", we as Christian should never stand for things damaging people's bodies. Or should we stand for abortion?, just because "thanks to abortion hundreds of 'mothers' have more free time to spend better quality time with their living families", it's just as fallacy as saying THANK GOD FOR GMO's.

I hope I made my point.

God bless you.


For sure, this article lacks of serious and real investigation. It's like saying "God bless narcos who feed people in small towns here in México". You know, Narcos can feed people, make schools, clothe the poor, but still KILL PEOPLE and do bussiness with poison.


The author of this article without a doubt has fallen prey to GMO marketing. A true Christian could NOT endorse such a monopolized and unhealthy product.

#1 GMO's were designed to withstand large amounts of CHEMICALS that KILL. Sure,  go ahead and tell your audience to eat that poison ladled food that puts 670 MILLION TONS of poison in our soils and water ways and tell them there is no consequence. It's people like you who promote an environment where 1 in 2 men get cancer and 1 in 3 women. God did not intend for us to use poison to kill his creature to grow our food. This is not true to God's natural cycles. Look around, look at nature. Look to the forests. Does anyone have to sweat and labor to produce the abundance that God provides? NO. You can grow food in the way GOD intended without breaking your back. We did! After planting our 1 acre garden we did not have to water once or weed because of the conservation methods we employ. There are ways of working and using natural resources to grow healthy food that also protects the environment, which is your health. If you cared about the human population you could not possibly endorse such a polluted way.

#2 If you are worried about feeding the world then we should burn every GMO seed. Farmers cannot save seed from GMO's. When a few corporation own 90% of our food system we are vulnerable to the companies who own the seed. God didn't say I give you technology to corrupt the perfect food I provided. NO!! Gen1:29 I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food." God gave us seed and Monsanto aka MonSantan took it away.

Justin Edwards
Justin Edwards moderator

Vanessa, I think this article was written with folks like you in mind. You've provided an object model for why it was necessary, legalism and all.


This follows the exact rain of though I have been on for the last several months.  Along with "who of you by worrying [about organic, non GMO, fair trade chemical free food] can add a single hour to their life.  While you talked from the perspective of the benefit to the poor, think about this.  We are very nearly the only country in the world that afford to even have this discussion.  Because we have "disposable income" and are not starving or subsistence living.  

But what will happen when we get to heaven and got is going to ask us to give account for the money we spent on the "health" food that was 3-5 times the cost of cheaper alternatives.  

I saw this short film just after reading 2 long rants about Christians and food and health.  Are there other things we can do with our money than pursue the idol of "health"?  You bet.  Please consider adding this to your blog post or doing another one on this topic to juxtapose the issues.

This is must see stuff: